Alaska’s Joe Miller on Face the Nation
ShareThis
Alaska’s next Senator?
Tuesday’s results and today’s polls seem to say so.
Alaska US Senate candidate Joe Miller (R) appeared on CBS’s Face The Nation this weekend. Unfortunately the interviewer was Bob Schieffer, one of the most left wing talking heads of the three major networks, but Miller handled the barrage of biased questions and left wing propaganda very well.
I had heard Miller was an impressive candidate, now I know for myself.
On the Debt.
“The government is going bankrupt. I don’t think anybody can deny it sitting at $13.3 trillion in absolute debt and $130 trillion in future unfunded obligations.”
When Schieffer attempted to paint Miller as a “radical”.
“If one thinks that the Constitution is extreme then you’d also think the Founders are extreme.”
“We just want simply to get back to the basics and restore essentially the Constitutional foundation of the country.”
Miller’s plans for the future of Alaska.
“The Answer to this is to basically transfer the responsibilities and powers of the [federal] government back to the states and the people.”
There is no doubt in my mind that this man, Joe Miller, will be a far better representative of the people of Alaska than that RINO Lisa Murkowski.
Video – Alaska’s Joe Miller on Face the Nation








With that kind of common sense approach, Joe Miller is the type of leadership every citizen should be looking for in their state. The activists of the Tea Party are going to take over the Republican Party and vet office holders in the future. It may take several election cycles, but it will happen. It has taken a long time for the Progessive/liberal base to bring this country to the brink of ruin on a scale with the Roman Empire, so it will take years to repair the damage.
Miller impressed the heck out of me.
Shiffert did his best to make it sound like Miller was extreme! Unfortunately for Shiffert and the left, Miller gets it and come January he will become a calm, sensible advocate for returning the country to its historical constitutional roots.
The only thing worse than Schieffer’s penchant for asking run-on questions that never seem to get to the point is the agendized liberal bias of those questions.